If you’ve ever watched the show “Kitchen Nightmares”, you probably know the story: a struggling restaurant asks for help, an experienced chef steps in to save the business.
After a brutally honest diagnosis, the chef proposes clear solutions: redesign the menu, streamline kitchen processes, improve service, and, in many cases, change the staff’s attitude.
Throughout the episode, everything seems to go well. There’s tension, conflict, catharsis… and finally, transformation. The restaurant gets a makeover, the staff seems motivated, and the owners regain hope.
But if you dig into what happens months later, you’ll find an uncomfortable reality: most of those restaurants end up closing.
What’s really going wrong?
It’s not the diagnosis, the strategy, or a lack of technical expertise. What fails on that show (again and again) is sustained implementation over time.
Or put differently, the ability to change and maintain new behaviors once the cameras stop rolling.
And it makes total sense. Changing habits, whether in individuals or in organizations like restaurants, isn’t something that can be achieved in a few days or a couple of coaching sessions.
It takes time, consistency, and very specific conditions for that change to not only be understood rationally, but also emotionally and behaviorally integrated by those within the system.
Changing habits is a psychological and cultural process
Adopting new ways of working, making decisions, or interacting professionally doesn’t just depend on knowing what to do—it depends on being able to keep doing it consistently.
And that requires much more than following a new process: it means transforming behaviors, beliefs, and automatic (individual and systemic) responses that have often been ingrained for years.
Changing habits isn’t a one-time action—it’s a journey that requires time, consistency, and above all, the right attitude toward difficulty. This is where Stephen Covey’s 10/90 principle is so revealing: 10% of life is what happens to us; 90% is how we respond to it.
In the context of transformation, this means that difficulties are inevitable, but how people respond to them is what truly makes the difference.
Sustainable habit change requires specific internal conditions to ensure new behaviors are understood, internalized, and sustained. That includes:
- Unlearning old patterns that have become part of the collective comfort zone.
- Breaking cultural inertia deeply normalized in the organization.
- Accepting discomfort and uncertainty as a natural part of the process.
- Having an environment that supports change and views mistakes as part of learning.
And above all, developing a proactive attitude that doesn’t wait for ideal conditions, but takes responsibility and remains open to each challenge.
Changing habits isn’t easy, but it’s possible. And when collective attitude aligns with the intention to change, the door opens to transformation—one that can be implemented and sustained.

Is this related to digital and organizational transformation?
Very much so, as you may have guessed. Companies undergoing transformation processes often hire prestigious consultants, build ambitious roadmaps, and launch initiatives that look great on paper.
But what determines the real impact is not the quality of the plan—it’s the organization’s ability to change real behaviors in a sustainable way.
And this is where many transformations fail and create their own version of a “nightmare at the office”: not because the plan was flawed, but because the company wasn’t ready (culturally or emotionally) to sustain the change.
Is it worth trying?
Absolutely! Even if the path is hard and success isn’t guaranteed, transformation remains one of the best bets an organization can make to evolve and stay competitive.
Some companies may still survive without significant cultural changes—thanks to brand power, dominant market position, or protected niches. But they’re the exception. For most, not transforming means gradually losing relevance.
And even more: the companies that manage to embed change into their culture and genuinely shift habits will gain a powerful competitive edge.
What do organizations need to achieve it?
- Consistent leadership that inspires and supports change, beyond mere speeches.
- Time and patience, because habits don’t change overnight or by decree.
- Spaces for learning and emotional safety, where making mistakes is part of the process.
- Cross-functional commitment, because change cannot fall on just one person or team.
We're talking about leadership, time, patience, commitment… and all of that comes down to people. Just to be crystal clear: you can’t drive deep transformation if you’re only thinking about processes, structures, or technologies.
Organizations don’t really change unless the people within them grow, adapt, and find meaning in the change. That’s why embracing true transformation also requires adopting a humanistic mindset: recognizing that people are living, rational, and emotional beings—and that they are the core of any complex organization.
If we want sustainable change, we must promote personal growth, care for individual and collective well-being, and build environments where people feel safe and actively involved in the evolution process.
Because only when change is experienced from within—with awareness, commitment, and respect—can an organization grow in a solid and lasting way.

Taking it further, the organizations that succeed in transforming their habits through a humanistic approach—those that adapt quickly and learn from every attempt (success or failure)—are reaching the next level: they not only survive change, they grow stronger from it.
This is precisely the essence of antifragility: it’s not about resisting chaos, but growing through it.
Companies that make transformation a regular practice, that learn to evolve even in uncertainty, become more resilient, more innovative, and more prepared for whatever the future holds.
And that’s exactly why humanism and antifragility are two of the core principles we use at Rev by Paradigma to help companies become the best version of themselves.
Because it makes sense—and because the chef-style approach just isn’t enough anymore. No more nightmares at the office.
References
To wrap it up, here are two posts by colleagues that explore both of these concepts in depth:
- Conscious, humanistic and evidence-based leadership, by María José Fonseca.
- Strategies to build antifragile companies, by Mauricio Contrera.
Comments are moderated and will only be visible if they add to the discussion in a constructive way. If you disagree with a point, please, be polite.
Tell us what you think.